McHenry County, Illinois



Your banner here!

Classifieds |Jobs | Local Websites | Schools | Movies | Illinois Lottery | Entertainment | Events Real Estate | Web Search | Business Directory | Site Map | Contact Us | About Us | Home

 

 

 


Please use this form to send your opinion.


January 11, 2006


To whom it may concern,

I have a real issue w/ joint agreements between schools. I am now one person who is stuck in the cracks! I started ECC back in the year 2000! When my current college did not offer Graphic design. Last year, Harper College began to offer the graphic design program.

I am a mother of three children who works part-time as of now so I can get my degree. The problem is Harper College will not give me a joint degree and ECC wants me now after all these years pay out of district prices. Which comes to $864.00 per class not including supplies and books needed? I have been paying out of my pocket for everything, and with three kids, and a part-time job, there is no way I can afford that kind of money. I have talked with both the schools and neither one is willing to help me! Where is the justice, I am a hard working person who just wants to better my family life by getting a college education. Up until now I thought I was doing that!

 Now I’m art a lost for words and stuck in the cracks because I could not finish my two year degree in two years. Because I worked a full-time job, going to school part-time and am raising 3 kids. Now that I dropped to part-time so I can finish my class and start looking for a better job in graphic design, my degree has come to a halt thanks to joint agreements w/schools. The new graphic design classes at Harper do not offer the old classes for my degree. I think both districts should be ashamed of themselves, for being so greedy over money. While a struggle mother of three is just trying to make her families life better.
   

Sincerely,
Jennifer Bernico


1.19.04

You aimed at the wrong target!

An editorial in a neighborhood newspaper recently compared the meetings of our trustees  as a circus and suggested that we find  a mediator or a therapist to resolve the difficulties.

If that writer had been at all sensitive to what is going on at Richmond Trustees' meetings, he or she would never have written  such a letter criticizing our Board members. If anyone  has created a "circus" atmosphere, it is clearly Kevin Brusek, Board president.  When he looks at the faces of the four new Board members, he no longer sees the faces of "Yes men and women" who would never challenge his authority. Now, he sees democracy in action as the new trustees challenge his well-honed skill in monopolizing both the agenda and the debate, This is a totally new situation for him and all indications are that he cannot handle democracy and will do everything he can to subvert the expression of their responsibilities as elected officials.

No, we do not need a therapist or a mediator, We
desperately need a Board President  who believes in the freedom of democratic participation. Someday soon, we will have such a President.

Bruce Young
5704 South St.
Richmond Il
815-678-4170

Eww, that Smell: When it Comes to the District  2 Mess, We All Stink a Little  

                Like the pungent aroma of fresh  fertilizer on a warm day, something stinks in Nippersink District 2. Every year, folks can count on flattened corn stalks and snowfall to bury that familiar, fertile smell. However, district officials will find no such cover this winter as they tackle a rotten referendum decision and contemplate for the second year in a rowhuge program and staff reductions . Last year it was $600,000 in cuts and the loss of Spanish instruction, sports teams, and teachers. This February it will be another $1 million in cuts, and “everything’s on the table.” As kindergartners on a farm field trip would say, “P.U!”

                Whatever causes  the stench, it floats through the district on the winds of apathy, SUV exhaust, and our frenzied, overscheduled lives.

                Every spring, when that seasonal stink is enough to make our eyes water, we roll up our windows and zoom by the freshly fertilized fields, counting the days ‘ til sweet corn. Every month, when important district decisions are made, we zoom by freshly typed meeting notices, counting the minutes ‘til our next errand. 

                Like ripe Limburger cheese or the barn at a busy farm, the stinky stew in which the district finds itself has many aromatic layers.

                1.) Start with the bitter blood simmering in  the veins of taxpayers who foot most of the schools’ bill but have (until recently) lacked accessible information about district finances.

                2.) Add a hint of smokiness from the scorched backsides of our beleaguered (and unpaid)  board members as the thermostat on their hot seats cranks up a few notches.

                3.) Mix in the smell of rotting corpse, a byproduct of last year’s bitter contract negotiations and of  the “put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is” attitude toward those picketing teacher supporters. 

                4.) Pour in some ghastly emissions from our active, mostly well meaning but sometimes misguided, rumor mill. This machinery burps out juicy toxic clouds that pollute the atmosphere, especially when we  accept rumors as fact and fail to consider their second- or third-hand sources.

                5.) Toss in the freezer-burned frustration of teachers facing  another round of March Pink-Slip-and Program-Gutting Madness while at the same time being told by the feds to leave “No Child Left Behind.” Don’t forget the acid panic of our art, music, band, and gym teachers as the budget axe swings inevitably toward their programs.

                6.) Drizzle into the stew the increasingly perceptible whiff of flop sweat coming off  our smooth-talking superintendent as he struggles to keep the lid on this festering brew through staff directives, platitudes, and vaguely worded reassurances.

                7.) For the foul final touch  in our festering concoction, stir in everyone’ s fishy misperceptions about the district. Whether these beliefs are based on  cynicism, oversimplification, or “ conventional wisdom,” they gunk up working  relationships and make us say stupid things. In my efforts to report on complicated district matters, I’m probably guilty of spreading some too.

                But let’s take a whiff of some of the stinkers that have been floating around.  Is District 2 truly top-heavy with overpaid administrators? A popular question, but what would the answer be if the complainers could shadow these administrators for a week? In addition, many folks have grumbled that our Lake Geneva-residing superintendent thinks of us as bumpkins who need to be told what’s best. Or does experience and the title “Dr.”  earn him the right to spare us “misinformed” folks from our own ignorance? And another thing: do teachers technically work part-time, as at least one board member is presumed to believe? Or do they struggle to cram 12 months of hard work into a nine-month school year? What about that so-called “vast silent majority” of shining happy residents who’ ll drown out the pesky questions of the “small disgruntled minority” if given the right  forum? If they really exist, they had better speak up soon! I’ve also heard  board members whine that community meetings showered with reams of documentation are pointless when it’s only the same  handful of die-hards who ever shows up. They do have a point there...In any case, if we don’t clear the air of these destructive attitudes our kids are in deep doo-doo.     

                Want to get informed? Check out the district’s web site, call or  e-mail a board member. Board members work for you, so ask them what’s going on.

                Don’t know how to get involved? Ask  somebody who already is. Getting informed is the first step. Then your opinions will truly  matter.

                Want to know what’s on the budget hit list? Show up at a board meeting. Study a budget summary. Read meeting minutes on the district’ s web site. Ask knowledgeable people non-judgmental questions. 

                Turned off by formal  board meetings and teacher mumbo- jumbo? Attend a relatively unstructured Communication Council meeting. Ask questions. Demand explanations.

                Afraid of feeling stupid? When it comes to educating your own kids, common sense trumps a PhD. Refuse to be patronized.

                Did it feel right to support teacher raises last fall? Then climb back out on that limb to help balance the impact such raises have had on the budget against the latest foul financial realities. 

            Does the idea of a referendum make you want to spit nails? Do you prefer schools with no arts, enrichment,  or sports programs? Consider all sides of the issue. Then push state politicians to reform Illinois' unfair tax structure. 

                Angry about what’s going on in our schools? Stick around for a couple of years, stay informed, and consider running for a board seat in 2005. Actions really do speak louder than words.

                Everyone agrees that the school situation stinks. Let’s hope it’s a temporary problem, however, like  spring manure or mystery meat in the fridge. Over the next critical months, people involved need to plug their noses, air out all their “issues,” and work together.  With luck, this odious matter will turn out to be the messy but potent fertilizer for our children’s success.  

 Michelle Parsons is a freelance education writer and parent who has lived in Spring Grove since 1996 and has been covering District 2 for The Richmond Report.


 

 

 

October 15, 2003

I have truly been inspired!!!! I've have talked to Administrators, principals, teachers, newspapers all day to find out if rumours of Dist.#46 cutting out kindergarten is a possibility should the next referendum fail. I have grown to hate the unfettered residential growth in and around Grayslake( I live in Hainesville). It is the enemy. I agree with these folks--something stinks real bad here in lake county, too. I want to know about any conflict of interest relating to residential builders, trustees, mayors, bankers, ...anything. If these people are going to raise a stink in my town by building us into the grave, then I intend on raising a little hell. Someone help me follow the money.

          Scott Frillman
          Hainesville, IL
          smfrillman@earthlink.net



September 30, 2003

Once again Richmond Village residents have been recipients of a mailing from anonymous concerned individuals who presume to speak out for the community by enumerating the various issues they feel the Village Board needs to focus  on.  I'm not a betting woman, but I'm willing to lay odds that in subsequent mailings these anonymous folks will present their easy and obvious solution to what they perceive to be our problems. 

Just go along with the scheme and give the developer a free hand.   Play nice...stop asking so many questions and demanding information.  Trust our Village President and Mr. Bell to do what is in the best interest of the community.

Inconceivable, there are some who still believe that more roof tops will  solve all our financial woes.  Historically, the one with the most to gain from residential developments turns out to be the developer while the Village is left with the care, maintenance, protection and education of the increased population.

It has been refreshing to attend Board meetings in which elected officials  openly discuss the agenda items (in fulfillment of campaign promises.)  I encourage you to attend meetings every first and third Wednesday at 7:30.

Kate Hellmann



 

July 29, 2003

Put me in the "no growth" camp please

by George Ryan

After much thought and some trepidation I am hereby announce that I am in the "no growth" camp for Richmond. Frankly, I would like to see Richmond stay as it is. Ten years from now the people who live here will be scratching their heads. "How could we have been so stupid?" they will be asking themselves when they see the ocean of rooftops surrounding the downtown area. Take a drive down to Lake in the Hills to see what I mean. The shock value alone makes this a worthwhile trip.

But this is my dream, not the reality. Comdisco, The Classics, Cunat and Sunset Ridge are carved in stone. Or are they? That is what I hear people say. I am hoping there is some room for revision on each of those developments.

Call me selfish. I want to close the barn door after the cow has left. When I moved into Richmond the town was still a very rural environment. When shopping for a new home I skipped all of the towns between here and Chicago where we lived at that time.

I am tired of people saying "You can't stop growth!" Frankly, I think that phrase was invented by some Roman housing developer who needed living space for the Huns. I always think of Long Grove when I hear that proclamation.

Correct me if I am wrong (by sending your strongly encouraged letter to the editor), but the last time I visited Long Grove seemed to be thriving without adding large housing tracts. I can only assume that when the first developers were knocking on Long Grove's door every week some very powerful and intelligent people took hold of the reigns and laid out a strong plan to control growth. The real genius down there persuaded Kemper to lay out a championship golf course around its corporate structures.

I would not mind seeing some commercial development created in the Richmond area. But we need to be creative. Message to Mr. Peter Bell: How about an Indian casino in Comdisco instead of all the houses? Eh? You could advertise it as the "Costa Rica of the Chicago Region!" Or how about a few skyscrapers? Would not people travel from McHenry, Hebron and Genoa City to work here? We would get the additional auto traffic that our local businesses treasure, but at least they would clear out at a reasonable hour. In this scenario we would not have to build and maintain those tax sucking schools.

"Without growth we won't be able to afford the new sewage plant!" I hear that lament often. Is it time to examine that issue? At this time the sewage plant can put out 375,000 gallons of water per day. The Comdisco development itself will eventually need at least one million per day. The new plant is proposed to deliver 1.5 million gallons per day at a cost of about $5 million or so. Well, isn't it obvious that if we had limited Comdisco's housing numbers that we would not need such a large sewage plant?

Why do people in Richmond want to take the low road? By that I mean, allowing developers to set the tracks of the course of history in the village is the easy way out. We don't have to think about it. We have people to blame when it is all over. And I'm not talking about your village board. Citizens, it is up to you to take control. The board is just a reflection of your desires as a group. If your leaders go astray, then it is up to you to set them straight.

Unfortunately I realize that this is a dream. It is just a matter of time that Richmond becomes an extension of McHenry and more like Crystal Lake. Don't get me wrong. I think both of those towns are great places to visit. After all, we'd have no place to shop without McHenry's Walmart district and< the and sheer shopping diversity that Crystal Lake has to offer.

It's just that I'd be very happy to travel the 10 minutes to McHenry to do my shopping in the future. On the way down I'd be able to view the sight of Glacial Park and in time that may be the only empty land between here and McHenry.

Folks, forgive me for dreaming.



July 20, 2003


When it comes to battling village boards, stand in line and take a number. I live in Spring Grove and we face the very same problem you described as going on in Richmond.

I agree that village boards don't listen to the citizens of their community, even when the citizens make it crystal-clear how they want an issue decided.

A classic case of village board politics in Spring Grove was when a decision supposedly was to be made if Spring Grove was going to allow that friggin' gravel pit and asphalt plant to be plopped in it's midst, right off Route 12. I attended that meeting (which had huge attendance) and not a single citizen stood up and said they wanted that gravel pit allowed  to open in the village. The board listened patiently to everyone's concerns and the digging started a few months later.

A fellow citizen at that same meeting told me that was exactly how Spring Grove ended up with Scot Forge. Citizens were universally against allowing the company into the village, the board sat through the meeting, listened to all and then allowed Scot Forge to build their foundry in spite of all the objections.

Same thing is now going on over commercial development being allowed to be established here. People moved in droves to Spring Grove to get away from the noise, lights, congestion and traffic that's found in built-up suburban areas closer to Chicago. They wanted to live in the country. They moved to Spring Grove to find peace and quiet. Spring Grove allowed them to move here and build lovely homes in nice subdivisions.

Once they were here, the village invited in an outside group to decide where to plunk shopping centers, supermarkets, strip malls, kwik-marts, gas stations and other unwanted services designed to turn the village into precisely the sort of place everyone moved here to get away from in the first place. Neither the board or the outside firm cared one whit if these commercial establishments were both unwanted and designated to be built within a stone's throw of expensive private homes. They didn't care if the owners of those homes objected and suffered a loss of property value because of the plans the village was endorsing. The decisions on commercial development in Spring Grove were drawn up prior to the meeting and virtually carved in granite when presented at the village board meeting. The meetings on this issue were a farce, convened for the board to put a veil of democracy on the proceedings while cramming their unwanted plans down everyone else's throats.

It all goes so smoothly and is done so consistently against the wishes of the village residents, one has to wonder if there's a little something made of silver that's crossed  palms to ensure certain outcomes are guaranteed in advance.

So no, you are not alone in Richmond, dealing with a village board that's gone rank and turned against the people who put them in their position of power. We have the same problem here.

I suppose, if all else fails, we can take a lesson from the good citizens of California. Don't like the people you voted in to represent your interests? Do a recall vote and put someone else in that WILL listen. Just a thought, of course, but if this nonsense continues it might come down to that simply to protect our residents and communities from the very people who told us they'd do exactly that if we'd just give them our vote.

Sincerely,

Pamela Guevara


February 6, 2003

Dear Editor:

There is a pivotal Village of Richmond election coming up on April 1st. Four of the six trustee spots are up for re-election, and there is a hot race brewing between incumbent trustees and new candidates. The reason to elect fresh faces is to change the dynamic of the Board. Stronger personalities are needed in order to say “no” to the Kevin Brusek / Charlie Eldredge regime that has been responsible for changing the character of Richmond through huge giveaways to developers.

In Richmond, “follow the money” is a central theme. Charlie Eldredge recently resigned as Zoning Chairman and is now on real estate mogul Peter Bell’s (Tamarack Farms aka Comdisco) payroll. If that was a conflict of interest, why do current Trustees allow Eldredge to continue chairing a sub-committee that is rewriting the zoning, subdivision, and other real estate-oriented ordinances?

Make no mistake, hundreds of millions of dollars are at stake in Richmond. Peter Bell and Bob May spent $20 million in one year amassing real estate, over and above that which they already owned (ie Fountainhead industrial park). Add up the future value of the commercial, industrial, and residential development that Brusek and Eldredge approved in a flash and “hundreds of millions” becomes accurate. In 1990, there were 800 acres within Richmond. Bell now owns 60% of the nearly 3,000 acres that today are within Richmond’s borders. Believe us, these fellas are not happy if anyone stands in their way.

It was no surprise that someone last week challenged the nominating petitions filed for Village of Richmond Trustee by two of the most outspoken critics of Brusek’s “annex and rezone first, plan later” mentality: Roy Wulffen and Chuck Schultz.

It turns out that the challenge was a sham. Diane Pearson withdrew her petition after it was discovered that she wasn’t registered to vote by that name at 10515 Main Street (a building owned and managed by the Eldredge family). Her complaint was dopey: the candidates didn’t write “four year term” at the top of each petition. No law says they should have. Pearson didn’t bother to show up at the hearings in Woodstock, although the candidates, their wives and neighbors, and their attorneys had to be there, twice.

Brusek’s staff didn’t post the first hearing 48 hours in advance, a violation of the Open Meetings Act, so the hearing had to be postponed. Another colossal waste of time and money for the candidates and for taxpayers.

And guess what? Brusek was one of the three “judges” in the case. While Illinois law stipulates that the Village President should sit on the panel, Brusek should have immediately recused himself and had a substitute appointed by the Court (a fairly common occurrence). Interestingly, Brusek stated that Village attorney John Roth had a “conflict of interest” in advising the judges, so instead, at taxpayer’s expense, Brusek hired Kevin McBride, an attorney who (ironically) brought a similarly frivolous lawsuit in Johnsburg a few years ago.

Back to Diane Pearson. How did Eldredge-tenant Pearson come to retain Militello, Zanck, and Coen, a high-falutin’ Crystal Lake firm? What was her motivation? Why did that firm agree to take the case? Don’t they both bear some responsibility for reimbursing the candidates and the Village of Richmond for their costs?

Clearly, this complaint was simply designed to thwart the election efforts of independent-minded candidates who have a demonstrated commitment to improving Richmond. It’s hard enough to get people to run for public office nowadays—shenanigans like this should be outlawed.

Seem like a tangled web? You bet. Which is precisely why taxpayers need to elect some new faces to the Village Board. “Follow the Money”! It’s not over yet. Stay tuned, ask questions, read the fine print, and watch your wallets!

John Drummond
Rommy Lopat
6119 Broadway Road
Richmond, IL 60071
(815) 678-4681


2/5/03

What's going on in Richmond with the person who filed the objection to the petitions of three candidates for the village board? According to the paper her name is Diane Pearson. She is not a registered voter, nor is anyone by that name living at the address she gave in the objection! I hear she lives in a house owned by Charlie Eldredge, the former zoning chairman and a guy who does work for Peter Bell, the developer of Comdisco. Something really smells fishy here, folks.

Smiley Fergueson


Hi, I am upset about  Metra wanting to come through my town. I live in McHenry, right by the tracks. I have lived here for a short time ,but I love where I live. I have Petersen Park close to my house, which I love. I do not want to move again. When me and my family were looking for a place to live, I fell in love with this area. I just can not stand the thought of a Metra train speeding through this nice big park, where children play, where the town has nice gatherings, fireworks, etc.... I like my town just the way it is. If I want to catch a train, there are other Metra trains close by. (Fox Lake,Crystal Lake) So Metra leave my town alone and find some other town to pick on. WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE!!!
J.S.


I've lived in the Historic Woodstock District for 8 years.  In the last 2-3 years the slumlords seem to have taken over the City.  They cram as many people as possible into homes that have been chopped into numerous apartments. They don't allow enough parking spaces, thus forcing tenants to park illegally.  Many of the buildings have deteriorated to the point they are eyesores. Some owners even refuse to pay for garbage pick-up or to do landscape maintenance such as cut the grass or shovel snow.  Are there no standards for rental properties?  Many single family homeowners have put their houses up for sale rather than remain to see their neighborhoods become blighted.  What a shame.  The Square and the town in general used to be so charming and attracted visitors, costumers and potential home buyers.  Now people who haven't visited for a few years tell me they thought they were lost because Woodstock looks so different. Take a drive around the 4 blocks or so surrounding the Square and you will see what they mean. I think the City Council should address this important issue before our once lovely City is completely ruined.

L. Hughes


This is not a protest about any ethnic class of people but my pet peeve is that if you are a citizen of the United States, then you should be able to read, write and speak the English language. If this is one the requirements before becoming a nationalized citizen, then why are we seeing more and more articles going to Spanish?

For instance: the GED. Why is it written both in English and Spanish? Why are ballots going to be written in English and Spanish? This is so wrong not because I speak English, but other groups, like Russians, Koreans, etc. come to this country speaking little or no English, yet they learn this language. So why not the Hispanic population? Why are we treating them to more services in their native language when we do not do that with other ethnic groups? Why should we as tax paying citizens pay for non citizens who only read and write in Spanish give them the ability to take the GED in their native tongue? There is nothing wrong with a family who speaks their native language at home and teach their young ones that language as well, but when you are in the every day world, they should be able to read, write and speak English like every one else.

There is a lot of different people who make up our country. If we don't allow other nations to have these things in their native language then we do we allow it for the Hispanics?

PBrink


10/2/02

Dear Editor:

Judging by its refusal to vote on the Tamarack Farms annexation agreement, it's possible that the Richmond Village Board may finally be listening to its residents. On the other hand, since all the (unanswered) hard questions posed to Tamarack Farms' owners Peter Bell and Bob May were asked by the large audience and not by the Village Board, I'm not sure yet that the Village Board will insist on a well-planned project.

This annexation agreement may technically only consider 47 acres, but what's really at stake is the nearby 1,100 acre development parcel. The public has made it very clear that it wants to see all the roadways leading in and out of the entire project before the 47 acre piece is annexed. We also insist on no additional traffic on Broadway, the prettiest entrance to our town. Its graceful Victorian homes and antique stores define Richmond. The thought of it widening with curbs, streetlights, stripes and stoplights at Route 12 and also Route 173 to accommodate 50-1650 houses is beyond absurdity.

The density is still too high, the zoning hasn't really changed, the design is boring, and the open space and natural resource questions are not solved. More importantly, we need a plan for this town that guides Bell and May, who now own virtually all the vacant land close to Richmond plus the industrial park. It's really easy to get growth and rooftops, but it's really hard to maintain the character of a small town as you grow. That takes vision, time, hard work, and attention to detail. Is the Village Board up to that challenge?

Sincerely,

Susi Wilson
Richmond


 

 


 

Towns in McHenry County, Illinois
(click for more info about each town)
Algonquin Cary Crystal Lake Harvard Hebron Huntley Johnsburg
Mchenry Marengo Richmond Spring Grove
Woodstock Wonder Lake


Internet Services and Website Development

Design by Adastra Designs

tea treetea tree oiltea tree oilbyron footstoolbyron footstoolbyron footstoolbyron footstoolbyron footstoolbyron footstoolbyron footstoolteenkraftshoesladies shoesladies